| To: | Brent Bice <bbice@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:11:48 +1000 |
| Cc: | Alex Lyakas <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Shyam Kaushik <shyam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <570CDC0B.3070802@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <0A92B65A3BF94F60BB36EA3FA716DF1F@alyakaslap> <570CDC0B.3070802@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:29:15AM -0600, Brent Bice wrote: > Could you resend it to be sure? I flagged it for redelivery the > day I emailed you so if nobody else has seen it yet then something > still didn't work. I was pretty sure I'd seen it get delivered ok > to oss, but... (shrug) No, it didn't, and it's not in the archives, either. It seems that sgi.com is rejecting quite a bit of legitimate mail lately. I've seen a couple of people in the past couple of weeks send stuff that has reached my private in boxes but not the list. Now this one, too. If someone is having to micro-manage the list to prevent rejections of valid email then that is bad... -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC PATCH] block: wire blkdev_fallocate() to block_device_operations' reserve_space, Mike Snitzer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Abort intent log item in xfs_iflush() upon error to get buf, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe, Brent Bice |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe, Brent Bice |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |