xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io

To: Vishal Verma <vishal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:56:46 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1459320877.4102.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1459303190-20072-1-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <1459303190-20072-6-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <20160330063415.GA2132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1459320877.4102.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:54:37AM -0600, Vishal Verma wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 23:34 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi Vishal,
> > 
> > still NAK to calling the direct I/O code directly from the dax code.
> 
> Hm, I thought this was what you meant -- do the fallback/retry attempts
> at the callers of dax_do_io instead of the new dax wrapper function..
> Did I misunderstand you?

Sorry, it is.  I misread fs/block_dev.c as fs/dax.c before my first
coffee this morning.  I'll properly review the series in the afternoon..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>