| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 03/16] xfs: rmap btree add more reserved blocks |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:32:45 -0800 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160310220945.GY30721@dastard> |
| References: | <1457410578-30233-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1457410578-30233-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160310142207.GD29058@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160310220945.GY30721@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 09:09:45AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > The root btree blocks are not a fixed location. The moment the tree > splits to the root we get a new root block and the old root is now > at a lower level of the tree. IOWs, it doesn't matter if there is a > hole at the time of growfs/mkfs laying out the initial tree roots > because they are going to move around anyway. Yeah, once we update the root it moves anyway. Objection retracted.. |
| Previous by Date: | First Time Ever: Official Mayo Clinic Diet is Online!, Mayo Clinic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: ensure committed is initialized in xfs_trans_roll, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 03/16] xfs: rmap btree add more reserved blocks, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 01/16] xfs: introduce rmap btree definitions, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |