xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset

To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:10:12 -0800
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAL3q7H5NRUXvo=mEtGr4-S4yPT7k_yw6LsMAq_V8bPD1T=7r0g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160215204608.7977.2802.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160215204614.7977.2848.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160217095646.GA21482@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAL3q7H5NRUXvo=mEtGr4-S4yPT7k_yw6LsMAq_V8bPD1T=7r0g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:04:23AM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > What does btrfs return here?
> 
> -EINVAL, so this makes the test pass on btrfs.

Ok, looks fine to me then:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>