xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 21/23] xfs: aio cow tests

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/23] xfs: aio cow tests
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:32:15 +1100
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160209011401.23099.38.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160209011145.23099.95354.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160209011401.23099.38.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:14:01PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
.,,,
> +
> +echo "Check for damage"
> +_dmerror_unmount
> +_dmerror_cleanup
> +_repair_scratch_fs >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1

Are you testing repair here? If so, why doesn't failure matter.
If not, why do it? Or is _require_scratch_nocheck all that is needed
here?

> +echo "CoW and unmount"
> +"$XFS_IO_PROG" -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 $((blksz * bsz)) 1" "$testdir/file2" >> 
> "$seqres.full"
> +"$XFS_IO_PROG" -f -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b $((blksz * bsz)) 0 $((blksz * nr))" 
> "$TEST_DIR/moo" >> "$seqres.full"

offset = block size times block size?

I think some better names might be needed...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>