xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 12/23] xfs/122: support refcount/rmap data structures

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/23] xfs/122: support refcount/rmap data structures
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:43:30 +1100
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160209011303.23099.40721.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160209011145.23099.95354.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160209011303.23099.40721.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:13:03PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Include the refcount and rmap structures in the golden output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/122     |    3 +++
>  tests/xfs/122.out |    4 ++++
>  tests/xfs/group   |    2 +-
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/122 b/tests/xfs/122
> index e6697a2..758cb50 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/122
> +++ b/tests/xfs/122
> @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ xfs_da3_icnode_hdr
>  xfs_dir3_icfree_hdr
>  xfs_dir3_icleaf_hdr
>  xfs_name
> +xfs_owner_info
> +xfs_refcount_irec
> +xfs_rmap_irec
>  xfs_alloctype_t
>  xfs_buf_cancel_t
>  xfs_bmbt_rec_32_t

So this is going to cause failures on any userspace that doesn't
know about these new types, right?

Should these be conditional in some way?

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>