On Mon 08-02-16 15:27:49, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 05-02-16 12:05:19, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:28:05PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Add infrastructure for supporting get_nextdqblk() callback for VFS
> > > quotas. Translate the operation into a callback to appropriate
> > > filesystem and consequently to quota format callback.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > I'm a little confused here. What patchset is this dependent on? i.e.
> > what introduces the ->get_nextdqblk method?
>
> It depends on the patches Eric sent which introduce ->get_nextdqblk.
>
> > The patches I currently have in my XFS working tree introduce this
> > (quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA) and everythign else is
> > dependent on this. I looked a coupl eof days ago and I wasnt' able
> > to find this in your tree.
>
> Yeah, I have this patch as well, I just didn't push out.
>
> > I'd much prefer that one of us publish a stable branch with just the
> > quotactl() infrastructure (i.e. commands and bits up to the
> > ->get_nextdqblk() callback) that we can then both base the different
> > subsystem implementations off, rather than one of us having to pull
> > in a whole tree of changes just to get the one commit we need...
>
> Sure, I have pushed out:
>
> 'getnextquota' branch into my tree
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git
>
> which contains the patches from Eric I carry (including fixups in comments
> other minor stuff I have found during final review). Can you please base
> XFS patches on top of this branch? Thanks!
Ah, now I saw your next email and you already created the stable branch.
OK, since I didn't push out anything yet, I will base my branches on top of
yours. I have made some small fixups in the comments but I can push these
as a separate patch.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
|