xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type V3

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type V3
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:22:12 +0100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160201212238.GV6033@dastard>
Mail-followup-to: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <1454000266-22541-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <56AA51B7.7030403@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160201095707.GB8141@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160201212238.GV6033@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:22:38AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:36:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > On 1/28/16 10:57 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > > >                 xfs_disk_dquot_t        *ddqp = &dqp->q_core;
> > > >  
> > > > -               /*
> > > > -                * The warnings and timers set the grace period given to
> > > > -                * a user or group before he or she can not perform any
> > > > -                * more writing. If it is zero, a default is used.
> > > > -                */
> > > 
> > > Not sure why you removed this comment?
> > > 
> > Regarding this comment, I think it's just redundant with the previous 
> > comment, I
> > left it in the code for the V4 though, I believe Dave can rip it off if it 
> > is
> > really redundant.
> 
> No, please don't ask me to do make random patch edits on commit -
> it's your job as a patch submitter to get it right. I will sometimes
> do this for simple patches or patches that come from a
> never-seen-before-and-never-seen-again patch submitter, but for a
> regular developer submitting non-trivial patches I won't change the
> patches because the issue hasn't been sorted out during peer review.
> 
Hey, I apologize, I had no intention to give you any extra job :) I meant that
in case you agreed or not with the comment, I thought you could decide by
ripping the comment off or not, I had no intention to actually give you some
unfinished job.

In any case, I sent a V4 of this patch with the comment's change Eric suggested,
adding his review-by too, although, a quick look from him again would be nice,
I'll figure it out with him.

cheers.


> Work it out with Eric, get a reviewed-by tag, and I'll apply it as
> reviewed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

-- 
Carlos

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>