Re: [PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff

xfs

Re: [PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t

To:	Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:55:40 -0800
Cc:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20160112200001.GE568@nyan>
References:	<cover.1452627740.git.felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> <20160112200001.GE568@nyan>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:00:01PM +0100, Felix Janda wrote:
> These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t.
> 
> In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so
> that off64_t could be replaced by off_t.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t, Felix Janda Re: [PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 3/6] fsr/xfs_fsr.c: Include <paths.h> for _PATH_MOUNTED, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 5/6] include/linux.h: Include <stdio.h> for fprintf and stderr, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t, Felix Janda
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 5/6] include/linux.h: Include <stdio.h> for fprintf and stderr, Felix Janda
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]