On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 06-01-16 11:14:09, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ross Zwisler
> > <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > __dax_dbg() currently assumes that bh->b_bdev is non-NULL, passing it into
> > > bdevname() where is is dereferenced. This assumption isn't always true -
> > > when called for reads of holes, ext4_dax_mmap_get_block() returns a buffer
> > > head where bh->b_bdev is never set. I hit this BUG while testing the DAX
> > > PMD fault path.
> > >
> > > Instead, verify that we have a valid bh->b_bdev, else just say "unknown"
> > > for the block device.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > fs/dax.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> > > index 7af8797..03cc4a3 100644
> > > --- a/fs/dax.c
> > > +++ b/fs/dax.c
> > > @@ -563,7 +563,12 @@ static void __dax_dbg(struct buffer_head *bh,
> > > unsigned long address,
> > > {
> > > if (bh) {
> > > char bname[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> > > - bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> > > +
> > > + if (bh->b_bdev)
> > > + bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> > > + else
> > > + snprintf(bname, BDEVNAME_SIZE, "unknown");
> > > +
> > > pr_debug("%s: %s addr: %lx dev %s state %lx start %lld "
> > > "length %zd fallback: %s\n", fn, current->comm,
> > > address, bname, bh->b_state, (u64)bh->b_blocknr,
> >
> > I'm assuming there's no danger of a such a buffer_head ever being used
> > for the bdev parameter to dax_map_atomic()? Shouldn't we also/instead
> > go fix ext4 to not send partially filled buffer_heads?
>
> No. The real problem is a long-standing abuse of struct buffer_head to be
> used for passing block mapping information (it's on my todo list to remove
> that at least from DAX code and use cleaner block mapping interface but
> first I want basic DAX functionality to settle down to avoid unnecessary
> conflicts). Filesystem is not supposed to touch bh->b_bdev.
That has not been true for a long, long time. e.g. XFS always
rewrites bh->b_bdev in get_blocks because the file may not reside on
the primary block device of the filesystem. i.e.:
/*
* If this is a realtime file, data may be on a different device.
* to that pointed to from the buffer_head b_bdev currently.
*/
bh_result->b_bdev = xfs_find_bdev_for_inode(inode);
> If you need
> that filled in, set it yourself in before passing bh to the block mapping
> function.
That may be true, but we cannot assume that the bdev coming back
out of get_block is the same one that was passed in.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|