xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:14:29 -0800
Cc: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151210163449.GA15774@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151208062844.21871.23644.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151208062904.21871.30589.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151210163449.GA15774@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either
> the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone
> behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring.  I didn't have
> time to look into why it's failing yet.

Huh.  Works reliably for /me; could you send me the output from 849?

--D

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>