xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests

To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:34:49 -0800
Cc: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151208062904.21871.30589.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151208062844.21871.23644.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151208062904.21871.30589.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either
the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone
behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring.  I didn't have
time to look into why it's failing yet.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>