xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 03/51] xfs_io: support reflink and dedupe of file ranges

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/51] xfs_io: support reflink and dedupe of file ranges
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:57:24 -0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151109183311.GA3255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151007050513.1504.28089.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151007050533.1504.66249.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151014053656.GJ10397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151109075438.GA17974@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151109183311.GA3255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:33:12AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 11:54:38PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Any reason why the dedup command is called 'dedupe'?  Is this a revenge
> > for the missing 'e' in the creat syscall? :)
> 
> Heh, sure! :)
> 
> I stuck on the 'e' because the btrfs tool is 'duperemove', not 'dupremove'.
> 
> (I have no preference either way.)
> 
> > Either way it would be good to get this support in ASAP so we can have
> > the command ready for xfstests and we can merge the test.  They are
> > useful for btrfs and NFS already, so I'd love to fast track them.

Oh. Heh.  I forgot that Dave merged the v1 patch into for-next after I'd posted
the v2 patch.  So ... I thought I'd convinced him to revert the v1 patch and
stuff in the v2 patch, but that hasn't shown up on kernel.org.

-ETOOMANYPATCHES :(

--D

> 
> <nod>
> 
> --D
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>