| To: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: "This is a bug." |
| From: | Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.j.tarvainen@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:03:39 +0300 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150910175557.GE27863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20150910134828.0bdfcc4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910115548.GD26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910123030.GG26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910123603.GA27863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910125441.GA28374@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910130106.GB27863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910130530.GB28374@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910145154.GC27863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910173138.GB18940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910175557.GE27863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:55:58PM -0400, Brian Foster (bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > So that's a 6TB fs with over 24000 allocation groups of size 256MB, as > > > opposed to the mkfs default of 6 allocation groups of 1TB each. Is that > > > intentional? > > > > Not to my knowledge. Unless I'm mistaken, the filesystem was created > > while the machine was running Debian Squeeze, using whatever defaults > > were back then. > Strange... was the filesystem created small and then grown to a much > larger size via xfs_growfs? Almost certainly yes, although how small it initially was I'm not sure. -- Tapani Tarvainen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: "This is a bug.", Tapani Tarvainen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "This is a bug.", Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: "This is a bug.", Brian Foster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "This is a bug.", Brian Foster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |