xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "This is a bug."

To: Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.j.tarvainen@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "This is a bug."
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:36:04 -0400
Cc: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150910123030.GG26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20150910091834.GC24937@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910134828.0bdfcc4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910115548.GD26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910123030.GG26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:30:30PM +0300, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On 10 Sep 14:55, Tapani Tarvainen (tapani.j.tarvainen@xxxxxx) wrote:
> > On 10 Sep 13:48, Emmanuel Florac (eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > 
> > > > xfsprogs version 3.1.7+b1.
> > > 
> > > Don't use that, it's much too old. Use at least a 3.2.x version, or if
> > > possible the very latest version of xfs_repair.
> 
> With (self-compiled) 4.2.0 version xfs_repair without -L no longer
> refuses to run but after a while failed with
> 
> [...]
> correcting nextents for inode 2152363147
> xfs_repair: dinode.c:1961: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' 
> failed.
> Aborted
> 
> With -L ... same result.
> 

Care to post the metadump?

Brian

> -- 
> Tapani Tarvainen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>