xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "This is a bug."

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "This is a bug."
From: Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.j.tarvainen@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:30:30 +0300
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20150910115548.GD26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20150910091834.GC24937@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910134828.0bdfcc4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150910115548.GD26847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
On 10 Sep 14:55, Tapani Tarvainen (tapani.j.tarvainen@xxxxxx) wrote:
> On 10 Sep 13:48, Emmanuel Florac (eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> > > xfsprogs version 3.1.7+b1.
> > 
> > Don't use that, it's much too old. Use at least a 3.2.x version, or if
> > possible the very latest version of xfs_repair.

With (self-compiled) 4.2.0 version xfs_repair without -L no longer
refuses to run but after a while failed with

[...]
correcting nextents for inode 2152363147
xfs_repair: dinode.c:1961: process_inode_data_fork: Assertion `err == 0' failed.
Aborted

With -L ... same result.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>