xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree

To: Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the xfs tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 23:37:29 +1000
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, David Jeffery <djeffery@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1441200891.17400.1277.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20150902121649.7a686b6c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C57DF728-E46C-433C-AA9D-209557D795E2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150902230342.125e23ce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1441200891.17400.1277.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Roger,

On Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:34:51 +0100 Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
>
> Huh, now I've had my coffee, that extra check doesn't add anything.
> (There's no harm done in assigning zero to io_error if it's already
> zero.) Apologies for the noise.

That's OK, my excuse is being to far at the other end of the day ...

I actually now remember thinking the same thing at the time I did it :-)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>