xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inode

To: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes
From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:11:44 -0400
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxx, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-team@xxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vDYTqx49tpzJTIiPzjqo7pFXDc3qIPmfdxBM2UAvcrY=; b=k6qJXeE7u5c1YOE6ZT1j84ip9IdvzAs4f7tKpVF9Qk+sUM3iRlFYJgbnP/hlnHBdKw gFk/adH7ON+y3x9zXMD5hhks99EShMHrXo3h3PvT+a7ryqbDSWX6YH5qxETuT18kcCCE OPX7tbYS7hKRdYImfRHA73B2JONxlErFZQWS1J95FNgsMnkbxcwob2eK95TKZUhIXlNs RSilKgdX1mxrv5MFm5yl5Ti6XlRDZluCD4qAIkr5SnR8ifbXY4QbW8wrsV1ICAfA5U12 ZDGDFY6qEJPQrw/dxp0sZPQoRG9anTVjaMLDmGO65ZWWeDiD4tskY59T/0nE3aER0x9E 4IMg==
In-reply-to: <20150824145150.GA10029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20150818195439.GB15739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150818215611.GD3902@dastard> <20150821102053.GL17933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150822003025.GS3902@dastard> <20150822044609.GM17933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150824011123.GA714@dastard> <20150824031816.GO17933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150824062425.GU3902@dastard> <20150824091959.GA2936@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150824145150.GA10029@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Hello,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:51:50AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Bah, I see the problem and indeed it was introduced by commit e79729123f639
> > "writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean". The problem is that
> > we bail out of sync_inodes_sb() if there is no dirty IO. Which is wrong
> > because we have to wait for any outstanding IO (i.e. call wait_sb_inodes())
> > regardless of dirty state! And that also explains why Tejun's patch fixes
> > the problem because it backs out the change to the exit condition in
> > sync_inodes_sb().
> 
> Dang, I'm an idiot sandwich.

A question tho, so this means that an inode may contain dirty or
writeback pages w/o the inode being on one of the dirty lists.
Looking at the generic filesystem and writeback code, this doesn't
seem true in general.  Is this something xfs specific?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>