| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 05/11] xfsprogs: missing and dummy calls for OS X support |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:22:51 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150819102623.GK3902@dastard> |
| References: | <1439828606-7886-1-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> <1439828606-7886-6-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> <20150818214557.GC3902@dastard> <20150819080940.GA13130@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150819102623.GK3902@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 08:26:23PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:09:40AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:45:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Hmmm, looks like I accidentally comitted an earlier version of this > > > patch yesterday. Jan, can you send delta patches to what I committed > > > to address more recent review comments? Sorry, my bad. > > > > Can you revert it for now? I think most of these changes are incorrect > > and should either be dropped for now by disabling fsx or will need > > a major rework. > > I'll just rebase the for-next branch, I guess, and remove it > completely from the history. I've got another lockdep fix that needs > to be pushed before it all hits tomorrow's linux-next build, anyway. Getting my trees mixed up. I'll revert the patch on the next push. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch rebased to aa49338, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 简化您的工作,开发客户很简单, petersonballadap74408 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/11] xfsprogs: missing and dummy calls for OS X support, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/11] xfsprogs: missing and dummy calls for OS X support, Jan Tulak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |