xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: Fine-tuning for checks before the function call "xfs_qm_dqrele"

To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: Fine-tuning for checks before the function call "xfs_qm_dqrele"?
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:19:51 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55939BA8.1090400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <530CF8FF.8080600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402252117150.2047@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <530DD06F.4090703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402262129250.2221@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5317A59D.4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5479F823.60900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141130230904.GF16151@dastard> <558D1833.3080009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150629214355.GE7943@dastard> <55939BA8.1090400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:50:00AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > xfs_dqrele_inode() gets called on every inode in the inode cache,
> > and this change results in a cacheline in every inode being dirtied
> > even if they don't have dquots attached. Given the inode cache can
> > hold tens to hundreds of millions of inodes on large machines, we
> > don't want to dirty any cachelines we don't need to while walking
> > the inode cache and releasing dquots...
> 
> Would it make sense to annotate checks before such function calls
> as "LIKELY"?

No - it will be random as to whether the inodes have dquots attached
or not and so a static hint is always going to be wrong for
someone....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>