| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/4 V2] xfsprogs: zero out clean log in xfs_metadump |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:35:43 +1000 |
| Cc: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5575DFB1.4010004@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5568B7CE.9030709@xxxxxxxxxx> <5568BB5C.4080400@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5575AF7A.8050306@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20150608182947.GA18211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5575DFB1.4010004@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:32:17PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/8/15 1:29 PM, Brian Foster wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:06:34AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> When doing an obfuscated xfs_metadump, if the log is clean, zero > >> it out for 2 reasons: > >> > >> * It'll make the image more compressible > >> * It'll eliminate an un-obfuscated metadata source > >> > >> If the log isn't clean, and the user expected obfuscation, warn > >> that metadata in the log will not be obfuscated. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> V2: If not obfuscating, copy log as-is > >> > > > > FYI, I think v1 of this was already pulled into the for-next branch. > > Anyways... > > Yeah, I noticed - I'll ask dave to fix it (that one rebases, right?) :) Just send a delta patch against what I committed, that way I don't need to rebase the tree. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS Syncd, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: simplify transaction commit and cancel interfaces V2, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/4 V2] xfsprogs: zero out clean log in xfs_metadump, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/4 V3] xfsprogs: zero out clean log in xfs_metadump, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |