| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Feb 2015 06:24:04 +1100 |
| Cc: | "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20150202073024.GA9399@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <1421925006-24231-17-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <20150129205232.GB11064@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20150202073024.GA9399@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:30:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:52:32PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Who can give us ACKs on these last five fs/xfs patches? (And is it > > going to cause trouble if they go in through the nfsd tree?) > > > We'd need ACKs from Dave. He already has pulled in two patches so > we might run into some conflicts. Maybe the best idea is to add the > exportfs patch to both the XFS and nfsd trees, so each of them can > pull in the rest? Or we could commit the two XFS preparation patches > to both tree and get something that compiles and works in the nfsd > tree. This patch has already been committed to the XFS repo. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 10/20] nfsd: implement pNFS operations, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: struct xfs_sb is no longer tied to the on-disk format, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |