| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode |
| From: | Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Oct 2014 21:26:24 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>, Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxx>, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxx>, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20141018151738.GG30355@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1412952910-7142-1-git-send-email-jack@xxxxxxx> <20141011133452.GA29004@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141017192428.GA19788@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20141018151738.GG30355@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat 18-10-14 08:17:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:24:28PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > I don't see the 4-bytes per inode saving, what am I missing? Frankly, I
> > don't see a difference in readability but since you and Al agree on that I
> > concede to your taste :)
>
> It's the removal of s_inode_fields that saves 4 bytes.
But that was in the superblock, not in the inode...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: gather write metrics on multiple files, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Cron <root@krios> test -x /usr/sbin/anacron || ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily ), Cron Daemon |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/12 v2] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |