| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: refactor xlog_recover_process_data() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:09:21 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1409016101-9511-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1409016101-9511-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1409016101-9511-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
> @@ -3556,14 +3622,10 @@ xlog_recover_process_data(
> xfs_caddr_t dp,
> int pass)
> {
> + struct xlog_op_header *ohead;
> xfs_caddr_t lp;
> int num_logops;
> int error;
>
> lp = dp + be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_len);
> num_logops = be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_num_logops);
> @@ -3573,69 +3635,24 @@ xlog_recover_process_data(
> return -EIO;
>
> while ((dp < lp) && num_logops) {
> + ASSERT(dp + sizeof(struct xlog_op_header) <= lp);
> +
> + ohead = (struct xlog_op_header *)dp;
> + dp += sizeof(*ohead);
Using sizeof type and sizeof variable for the same thing right next
to each other seems weird. Also why duplicate the addition instead
of moving it below the assignment:
ohead = (struct xlog_op_header *)dp;
dp += sizeof(*ohead);
ASSERT(dp <= lp);
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bad performance on touch/cp file on XFS system, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: refactor xlog_recover_process_data(), Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/4] xfs: refactor xlog_recover_process_data(), Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: refactor xlog_recover_process_data(), Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |