| To: | Fanael Linithien <fanael4@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Aug 2014 10:54:04 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CA+o=1OVY0pV18XMKz98dT5LGwE500DQQb5B1wh=HaGTAGuP+oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CA+o=1OVY0pV18XMKz98dT5LGwE500DQQb5B1wh=HaGTAGuP+oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 09:23:46PM +0200, Fanael Linithien wrote: > Will the verifier fixes get backported to 3.15 and/or 3.16, or do we > have to wait for 3.17? What fixes are you talking about? List of commits, please, noting whether the commit already has a "cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" in it or not. > I don't want to wait for 3.17. My / has just been eaten by this bug, > and I'm reluctant to reinstall until it's fixed. Patch your kernel with the fixes you've identified are necessary, then - it can take some time for fixes to propagate through the stable process.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH RFC] xfs: use invalidate_inode_pages2_range for DIO writes, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't zero partial page cache pages during O_DIRECT, Chris Mason |
| Previous by Thread: | Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?, Fanael Linithien |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Verifier fixes backported to stable kernels?, Fanael Linithien |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |