On Wed 04-06-14 14:44:40, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 06:53:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Rounding in xfs_alloc_fix_len() is wrong. As the comment states, the
> > result should be a number of a form (k*prod+mod) however due to sign
> > mistake the result is different. As a result allocations on raid arrays
> > could be misaligned in some cases.
> >
> > This also seems to fix occasional assertion failure:
> > XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO(rlen <= flen, error0)
> > in xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size().
> >
> > Also add an assertion that the result of xfs_alloc_fix_len() is of
> > expected form.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks Jan.
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ping Dave? Are you going to pick up this patch?
Honza
> > fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c | 18 ++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> > index c1cf6a336a72..1351a24d3cdc 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> > @@ -257,16 +257,14 @@ xfs_alloc_fix_len(
> > k = rlen % args->prod;
> > if (k == args->mod)
> > return;
> > - if (k > args->mod) {
> > - if ((int)(rlen = rlen - k - args->mod) < (int)args->minlen)
> > - return;
> > - } else {
> > - if ((int)(rlen = rlen - args->prod - (args->mod - k)) <
> > - (int)args->minlen)
> > - return;
> > - }
> > - ASSERT(rlen >= args->minlen);
> > - ASSERT(rlen <= args->maxlen);
> > + if (k > args->mod)
> > + rlen = rlen - (k - args->mod);
> > + else
> > + rlen = rlen - args->prod + (args->mod - k);
> > + if ((int)rlen < (int)args->minlen)
> > + return;
> > + ASSERT(rlen >= args->minlen && rlen <= args->maxlen);
> > + ASSERT(rlen % args->prod == args->mod);
> > args->len = rlen;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.1.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > xfs mailing list
> > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
|