| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 May 2014 01:18:20 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1399348559-19889-6-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1399348559-19889-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1399348559-19889-6-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:55:59PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > We reject any filesystem that is mounted with this feature bit set, > so we don't need to check for it anywhere else. Remove the function > for checking if the feature bit is set and any code that uses it. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> If someone at SGI has some spare time for a BugWorks search I'd really love to figure out of the story behind the shared superblock feature.. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: don't need dirv2 checks anymore, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: keep sb_bad_features2 the same a sb_features2, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |