| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: attr cleanups |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 May 2014 07:52:41 +1000 |
| Cc: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140504101623.GA4947@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <1399130415-5382-1-git-send-email-hch@xxxxxx> <53651375.9080305@xxxxxxx> <20140504101623.GA4947@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 12:16:23PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the > > internal version of get and set attributes could be undone. > > We might have to introduce _locked version at that point. But I'd like > to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups. *nod* If we need to factor the code for new additions, then we should do that appropriately for the new code when it arrives. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] common: use a relative path to fsstress, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs: 3.2.0-rc2 release tagged, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: attr cleanups, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: attr cleanups, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |