| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:39:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5357DC3A.6060702@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <535580A1.20806@xxxxxxxxxx> <5356B986.2060906@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20140423152708.GA3326@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5357DC3A.6060702@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28:58AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Just out of curiousity, for what reason - just parity w/ the non-xfs > ops? Because it's just cleaner to have one methods for one operation instead of overloading them with different opts like an ioctl. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] xfs: consolidate xfs_inumbers, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS fragmentation on file append, Keyur Govande |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: add helper for zero range support check, Eric Whitney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |