| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode log reservations are still too small |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:34:28 -0800 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20140305214002.GI6851@dastard> |
| References: | <1393981893-2497-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1393981893-2497-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140305171441.GD11667@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20140305214002.GI6851@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
> We don't. We need to, I just haven't had the time to audit the rest > of the reservations to fix them all up yet. AFAIA, only the quota > off transactions don't have any slack in them for xlog_op_header > space - all the others that are incorrect probably have enough > overhead from the buffer overhead roundup to cover the lack ophdr > accounting on things like dquots. That's more or less what I expected.. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs: xfs_check_page_type buffer checks need help, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: fix use after free in inode_item_done(), Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode log reservations are still too small, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode log reservations are still too small, Brian Foster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |