| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:15:59 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131114164603.GA13628@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131114164603.GA13628@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hey Christoph,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:46:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Trying to support tiny disks only and saving a bit memory might have
> made sense on an SGI O2 15 years ago, but is pretty pointless today.
>
> Remove the rarely tested codepath that uses various smaller in-memory
> types to reduce our test matrix and make the codebase a little bit
> smaller and less complicated.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
This looks ok to me. I'm not seeing much downside to removing the smaller
in-memory types.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Справка о валютных операциях, УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ВАЛЮТНОГО КОНТРОЛЯ |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Письмо Минтруд, РОСТРУД |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Q: about xfs pre-allocation, LA Walsh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |