| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:01:10 +1100 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhi Yong Wu <zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131213202747.GL1935@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1386935393-23559-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> <20131213163131.GC20803@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131213202747.GL1935@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:27:47PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:31:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Looks good, > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Also discussed here: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00024.html > > Before pulling this in we should probably let Dave give another 2c. Well, I stand by what I wrote in that thread. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx listed as a maintainer; different and unusual doesn't mean it is wrong. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Security issue - storing NTACL's in non-NT-security-namespace, L.A. Walsh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] Handling of reviewed patch series, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove the incorrect entry in the MAINTAINER file, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |