| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS / writeback invoking soft lockup. |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:16:39 -0800 |
| Cc: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131213104853.GS10988@dastard> |
| References: | <20131213071407.GA6527@xxxxxxxxxx> <20131213104853.GS10988@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:48:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > All I can say is that there doesn't look to be any obvious signs > that this is a XFS or writeback problem fom the stack trace, and > without more information or a reproducable test case I'm not going > to be able to understand the cause. > > Is the problem reproducable, or is it just a one-off? If it's reproducable it would be good to enable the xfs_writepage tracepoint and get a trace-cmd log of it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] xfs: Introduce a common helper to calculate the number of blocks per cluster, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: set umask to avoid spurious generic/314 test failures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS / writeback invoking soft lockup., Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS / writeback invoking soft lockup., Dave Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |