| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfstests: do not unmount tmpfs during remount. |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:12:18 -0800 |
| Cc: | Junho Ryu <jayr@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131213014131.GP10988@dastard> |
| References: | <1386706321-15795-1-git-send-email-jayr@xxxxxxxxxx> <1386706321-15795-6-git-send-email-jayr@xxxxxxxxxx> <20131211074615.GE19248@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131211224012.GJ10988@dastard> <20131212180130.GA19422@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131212225657.GK10988@dastard> <CAFA30n9ea3A+V7JgCgqO5xOQchgB55oLP4AgtQ3KQpCMr9iEzQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131213014131.GP10988@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > All the generic tests that use dm_flakey are likely to be busted. > Anything assumes SCRATCH_DEV or TEST_DEV are block devices are > busted. These are already busted on nfs, which we've support in some form forever, and cifs, and btrfs with it's pools if they assume the actual device is the block device. > Do loop devices work properly when hosted on tmpfs > filesystems? And so on... They do. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/12] run more generic tests on TEST_DIR, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] xfs: use xfs_icluster_size_fsb in xfs_ialloc_inode_init, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfstests: do not unmount tmpfs during remount., Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfstests: do not unmount tmpfs during remount., Theodore Ts'o |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |