| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_get |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:01:59 -0800 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20131205205910.GD29897@dastard> |
| References: | <20131205155830.620826868@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131205155951.679310054@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131205205910.GD29897@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 07:59:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I think the locking here should be moved inside xfs_attr_get_int() Or we could just kill xfs_attr_get_int.. > so that it uses the same locking pattern as xfs_attr_set() and > xfs_attr_remove(). > > Also, xfs_attr_list() needs this treatment (the attr version of > readdir) as well (and it has the locking inside xfs_attr_list_int(), > too ;). > > It looks like xfs_readlink needs fixing, too. Haven't really done an in-depth audit, mostly just looking at where the asserts kick in.. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_get, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_qm_dqtobp, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_get, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_attr_get, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |