| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] ext2/3/4: dio reads stale data when we do some append dio writes |
| From: | Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2013 19:51:22 +0800 |
| Cc: | linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=LowqrDi92TUbnNSRvffOyERni2BP/xF/QhOGqV4AlAM=; b=yJnAtrorl7MXxYKyAQvhTigDthWqSsWr7HtEf/6lZ0hYL/vx4U5oOpLatQiH8HNlcb ncot4aYKT0CWom4YVbgezZuuhz1zTf0EdQHxH1Ds6BWRP0Rn19OrHW9WuV0cF6Vkyk+0 al/mdIlwL/0jsIzYrK7wqaL8OD74bYuFzW5P2/dkBJFAAnMjM7OKyTH0OGse8JQXogsu INJ1066lYPkVmalzDXir7R1VX5Gjrl9jWTX2bZrXlMkfurycBYdEJG8Vg1crdvuRSDSa I8OkXvos15uP/wzBzIwI291tCWjFs1As49eaRvl/wDKBbSZaSu+dAfamoGVfYx8UVjZf Suxg== |
| In-reply-to: | <20131119111826.GA20485@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20131119095302.GA4534@xxxxxxxxx> <20131119102235.GA5010@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131119104508.GA4630@xxxxxxxxx> <20131119110147.GA3323@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131119111947.GA4782@xxxxxxxxx> <20131119111826.GA20485@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 03:18:26AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:19:47PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > Yes, I know that XFS has a shared/exclusive lock. I guess that is why
> > it can pass the test. But another question is why xfs fails when we do
> > some append dio writes with doing buffered read.
>
> Can you provide a test case for that issue?
Simple. Reader just need to open this file without O_DIRECT flag. I
paste the full code snippet below. Please take care of this line:
readfd = open(argv[1], /*O_DIRECT|*/O_RDONLY, S_IRWXU);
The result of this program on my own sand box looks like below:
encounter an error: offset 0
- Zheng
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <memory.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#define BUF_ALIGN 1024
struct writer_data {
int fd;
size_t blksize;
char *buf;
};
static void *writer(void *arg)
{
struct writer_data *data = (struct writer_data *)arg;
int ret;
ret = write(data->fd, data->buf, data->blksize);
if (ret < 0)
fprintf(stderr, "write file failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return NULL;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pthread_t tid;
struct writer_data wdata;
size_t max_blocks = 10 * 1024;
size_t blksize = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
char *rbuf, *wbuf;
int readfd, writefd;
int i, j;
if (argc < 2) {
fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s [filename]\n", argv[0]);
exit(1);
}
writefd = open(argv[1], O_CREAT|O_DIRECT|O_WRONLY|O_APPEND|O_TRUNC,
S_IRWXU);
if (writefd < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to open wfile: %s\n", strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
readfd = open(argv[1], /*O_DIRECT|*/O_RDONLY, S_IRWXU);
if (readfd < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to open rfile: %s\n", strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if (posix_memalign((void **)&wbuf, BUF_ALIGN, blksize)) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to alloc memory: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if (posix_memalign((void **)&rbuf, 4096, blksize)) {
fprintf(stderr, "failed to alloc memory: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
memset(wbuf, 'a', blksize);
wdata.fd = writefd;
wdata.blksize = blksize;
wdata.buf = wbuf;
for (i = 0; i < max_blocks; i++) {
void *retval;
int ret;
ret = pthread_create(&tid, NULL, writer, &wdata);
if (ret) {
fprintf(stderr, "create thread failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
memset(rbuf, 'b', blksize);
do {
ret = pread(readfd, rbuf, blksize, i * blksize);
} while (ret <= 0);
if (ret < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "read file failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if (pthread_join(tid, &retval)) {
fprintf(stderr, "pthread join failed: %s\n",
strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
if (ret >= 0) {
for (j = 0; j < ret; j++) {
if (rbuf[i] != 'a') {
fprintf(stderr, "encounter an error:
offset %ld\n",
i);
goto err;
}
}
}
}
err:
free(wbuf);
free(rbuf);
return 0;
}
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix infinite loop by detaching the group/project hints from user dquot, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BUG] ext2/3/4: dio reads stale data when we do some append dio writes, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs: fix infinite loop by detaching the group/project hints from user dquot, Jeff Liu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [BUG] ext2/3/4: dio reads stale data when we do some append dio writes, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |