| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfstest failures |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:16:34 -0800 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20131106105451.GA31283@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131106194417.GF6188@dastard> <527A9F67.6000208@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 01:58:31PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > >>xfs/206 > >> > >> Does not expect the ftype flag. Didn't we change a generic > >> filter to take care of this? > > > >xfs/206 has it's own mkfs filter: > > > >http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00777.html And why is this patch not merged? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 15/37 V3] libxfs: fix root inode handling inconsistencies, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfstest failures, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfstest failures, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |