| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: don't try to mark uncached buffers stale on error. |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:31:08 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130924205949.GK1935@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1380002476-18839-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1380002476-18839-2-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130924153324.GF1935@xxxxxxx> <20130924203232.GA26872@dastard> <20130924205949.GK1935@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 03:59:49PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:32:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:33:24AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > > ...but it looks like your fix is in xfs_bdstrat_cb, which wouldn't have > > > been > > > involved in the stack you posted above. What am I missing? > > > > That the first hunk that changes xfs_bioerror_relse() fixes the bug > > that caused the assert failure through xfsbdstrat(). > > *blink* > > All I see in that first hunk are changes to comments. The second hunk seems > to > contain the only functional change, highlighted above. You are right - it should not be reliably fixing the failure I'm seeing. I'm sure there was something else in this patch originally - I'll go back and check. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: improve xfs_iext_destroy() by freeing extent indirection array directly, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Consultanta cesiuni, preluari firme, Consultanta cesiuni |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: don't try to mark uncached buffers stale on error., Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 3/5] xfs: asserting lock not held during freeing not valid, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |