| To: | Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 22 Sep 2013 11:51:04 -0700 |
| Cc: | David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722> |
| References: | <alpine.LRH.2.02.1309191229480.32035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130919.135628.1201613770803318193.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LRH.2.02.1309191359300.12162@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1379615474.22168.13.camel@joe-AO722> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way that we can easily add subsystems. To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | ] The No1 Stock ForecUast Engine, Stock100 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Laden Sie, mishel |
| Previous by Thread: | ] The No1 Stock ForecUast Engine, Stock100 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules, Joe Perches |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |