| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recovery |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Aug 2013 07:31:26 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <521E6680.80105@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1377688967-6480-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1377688967-6480-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <521E625A.2070109@xxxxxxx> <20130828210223.GO12779@dastard> <521E6680.80105@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:07:12PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 08/28/13 16:02, Dave Chinner wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:49:30PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > >>On 08/28/13 06:22, Dave Chinner wrote: > >>>From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>Looks good. Nice to get into Linux 3.12 and possibly back to stable. > > > >Why stable? It's v5 only code, and everyon knows that is still in > >the experimental stage.... > > yep. That doesn't answer my question. You had to have some reason for suggesting a possible stable backport for this code after reviewing it, and I'm interested to know what it was... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recovery, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recovery, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recovery, Mark Tinguely |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: check LSN ordering for v5 superblocks during recovery, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |