| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/003: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone |
| From: | Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:31:19 -0400 |
| Cc: | Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fusionio.com; s=default; t=1377106281; bh=H3j7wtRrS/ue1nWtG+dgnA1CXoBxmbtCzYY66rxowtI=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Glpu1CJ92aKQkBACVymMfXGHMyy9m+m7i6sxfHeBy63JGHdFxUc7Gd7aoZfXLVeeE WCCArPOzhrQCmMzhrB4E2xAPGT4gF2rIPN8qSj2/RV5nk4IkMn8k8jlc5GEm7zGBea 4cD3EGtOO1yi1bZKBJ0HVzOL7VaS0dg/g9LZvvck= |
| In-reply-to: | <5214EE7F.8090507@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1377101015-3070-1-git-send-email-jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <5214EE7F.8090507@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01) |
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:44:47AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 8/21/13 11:03 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a
> > little
> > longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from
> > btrfs
> > dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device.
> > To
> > fix this just stat and sleep if we still see the device node and only
> > continue
> > once udev or whatever actually removes the device node so that we don't get
> > random failures. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tests/btrfs/003 | 6 ++++++
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/btrfs/003 b/tests/btrfs/003
> > index 5c88651..dba1a32 100755
> > --- a/tests/btrfs/003
> > +++ b/tests/btrfs/003
> > @@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ _test_replace()
> > _devmgt_remove ${DEVHTL}
> > dev_removed=1
> >
>
> This should probably go into _devmgt_remove,
> and possibly the reverse in _devmgmt_add as well, with
> a comment explaining what it's doing?
>
> Otherwise someone else will run into the same problem down the line.
>
No, the next guy will have to go as much pain and annoyance as I did to make
sure he is worthy of the fix. Thanks,
Josef
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: add prototype for alloc_ex_data(), Rich Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a new quotactl command to support 3 quota types in XFS, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/003: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/003: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone, Josef Bacik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |