| To: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree |
| From: | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:22:46 +1000 |
| Cc: | Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Kerr <jk@xxxxxxxxxx>, cbe-oss-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gao feng <gaofeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130820192844.GC5262@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130820172052.1f0d89ddf6a1a40ef70333fd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130820120702.000b044e@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130820192844.GC5262@xxxxxxx> |
Hi Ben, On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just > revert > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but given > the choice would prefer the fix. Do you have a preference between the two > approaches that Dwight has posted? The first seems more conservative... I will automatically revert that commit when I merge the xfs tree until some other solution is forthcoming (so you don't have to do the revert in the xfs tree). This does need to be fixed fairly soon, though. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: add prototype for alloc_ex_data(), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm: Notify filesystems when it's time to apply a deferred cmtime update, Andy Lutomirski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree, Ben Myers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree, Ben Myers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |