| To: | Jay Ashworth <jra@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation) |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:41:05 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <32553786.2492.1375056392388.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130729000247.GA13468@dastard> <32553786.2492.1375056392388.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 08:06:32PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sure, they have diverged signficant;y as we've backported various > > bits of XFs fetaures and bug fixes back into RHEL6. As have every > > other distro that doesn't track mainline directly. That's why you > > need to look at the kernel source package to know what code the > > distro is running. > > And... all the way back to Jason's original question: > > The way that you get the information out of a kernel/kernel RPM to > determine which XFS version it's running... is? Cause it's clearly > not obvious to either him or me. The "version" of XFS that you are running is that of the kernel you are running. i.e. 2.6.32-279.x.y or 2.6.32-358.x.y. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: introduce object readahead to log recovery, Zhi Yong Wu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: introduce object readahead to log recovery, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Jay Ashworth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |