| To: | Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 44/49] xfs: Reduce allocations during CIL insertion |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:58:22 +1000 |
| Cc: | "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <51F2E4DD.4020301@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1374215120-7271-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1374215120-7271-45-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51EEF26F.5040001@xxxxxxx> <51EEF949.9020104@xxxxxxxxx> <51EFD68A.40400@xxxxxxx> <51F2E011.5020904@xxxxxxxxx> <51F2E4DD.4020301@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:06:37PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > I can reproduce a problem in patch 44 too. It takes my copy test 20 > minutes to deplete the log space with patch 44, Same test with patch > 43 has been running a day and a half. I do not think that patch 44 > is 100 times faster than patch 43 but I will let patch 43 spin all > weekend on a couple machines to verify that patch 43 does not hang. Details, please. What's your "copy test"? http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 24/49] xfs: kill xfs_vnodeops.[ch], Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A short digression on FOSS (Re: understanding speculative preallocation), Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 44/49] xfs: Reduce allocations during CIL insertion, Michael L. Semon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 44/49] xfs: Reduce allocations during CIL insertion, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |