| To: | Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is a list |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Jul 2013 19:24:06 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <c229feab100a72240128ef81297680a1@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1372777248-4114-1-git-send-email-ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130703064026.GL14996@dastard> <c229feab100a72240128ef81297680a1@xxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:14:41AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > Hi, > > Le 03.07.2013 08:40, Dave Chinner a écrit : > >On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote: > >>This patch changes type of xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >>The output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is > >>modified to report xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx as a list: > > > >What's the problem with that? All XFS patches and problem > >reports should be sent to the xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list. There are far > >more people than just the maintainer that can triage problems, > >answer questions and review patches... > > > > It was just disturbing: I was looking for a list for XFS > and found only maintainers. That's what the: L: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx entry is, yes? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | product package printing, Jinghao Printing - CHINA |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is a list, Yann Droneaud |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is a list, Yann Droneaud |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is a list, Yann Droneaud |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |