| To: | CAI Qian <caiqian@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 3.10-rc7: general protection fault at xlog_state_do_callback+0x88/0x2c0 [xfs] |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:55:48 +1000 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <115167995.4467705.1372131291931.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <510496923.4466531.1372130994988.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <115167995.4467705.1372131291931.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:34:51PM -0400, CAI Qian wrote: > This looks like triggered by xfstests test #13 > 001 17s > 002 1s > 003 1s > 004 2s > 005 0s > 006 28s > 007 51s > 008 3s > 009 2s > 010 [not run] dbtest was not built for this platform > 011 15s > 012 3s > 013 > > [32728.415359] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP The system has been running for close on ten hours before xfstests was run. I'm assuming that it's been running 10 hours of other tests like for previous bug reports. Can you reproduce this directly after a clean boot? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v9 6/6] xfs: Use new qs_pquota field in fs_quota_stat for Q_XGETQSTAT, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 59/60] xfs: Add xfs_log_rlimit.c, Mark Tinguely |
| Previous by Thread: | 3.10-rc7: general protection fault at xlog_state_do_callback+0x88/0x2c0 [xfs], CAI Qian |
| Next by Thread: | [IronPort-SUSPECTED-SPAM] Do and reply now, Charles Kalum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |