| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 19/27] xfs: consolidate xfs_vnodeops.c into xfs_inode_ops.c |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jun 2013 06:59:16 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1371032567-21772-20-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1371032567-21772-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1371032567-21772-20-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
I can't say I really like the _ops naming, but so far I can't really can't come up with a much better name. I also think that most of xfs_vnodeops.c really should go into xfs_iops.c as it's fairly Linux specific and should just be merged with the actual entry points. Also once the big code move around starts xfs_rename.c really should die and rename should be treated the same as the other namespace operations. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Questions about XFS, Roger Oberholtzer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: print missing utility name, Lukáš Czerner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 19/27] xfs: consolidate xfs_vnodeops.c into xfs_inode_ops.c, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 19/27] xfs: consolidate xfs_vnodeops.c into xfs_inode_ops.c, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |