| To: | Filippo Stenico <filippo.stenico@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Xfs_repair segfaults. |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 May 2013 09:39:10 +1000 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CADNx=KvxtCHEk9G07yS88-casVAXBxRTghV5nGKd_0LtcqpYpQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CADNx=KsT9DC=vveyTZx8EovddFx9mhRS-yzygaORHZ_4VyXfzQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5187BF8A.2040303@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=KvZPhbRn9Kc3+KdoAY7jZ3U0uyG6wgUB5vcxX85CkFdQg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=Kv0bt3fNGW8Y24GziW9MOO-+b7fBGub4AYP70b5gAegxw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5188FF88.6000508@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=KvmA7jgqBUO0YvKddHvFaqxHNZKfF3eWajOW8GWKwNhbA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=Kv=7TFkJKom6_JM8B+A6YRckj175TbCcHrTWYL_N-qkYw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNx=KvxtCHEk9G07yS88-casVAXBxRTghV5nGKd_0LtcqpYpQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 07:30:05PM +0200, Filippo Stenico wrote: > Hello, > -m option seems not to handle the excessive memory consumption I ran into. > I actually ran xfs_repair -vv -m1750 and looking into kern.log it seems > that xfs_repair invoked oom killer, but was killed itself ( !! ) That's exactly what the oom killer is supposed to do. > This is last try to reproduce segfault: > xfs_repair -vv -P -m1750 I know your filesystem is around 7TB in size, but how much RAM do you have? It's not unusual for xfs_repair to require many GB of memory to run succesfully on filesystems of this size... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: quota not supported on realtime filesystems, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3.9.0: general protection fault, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Xfs_repair segfaults., Filippo Stenico |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Xfs_repair segfaults., Filippo Stenico |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |