| To: | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:35:47 +1100 |
| Cc: | Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130327214804.GA28143@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5152F2BB.4000709@xxxxxxx> <20130327134606.GJ5861@xxxxxxxxx> <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard> <20130327214804.GA28143@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:48:04PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check > > script: > > > > SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" > > Ah, I thought support for named tests was there. For right now, > though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are > considered separate tests, right? Or do we still need to keep the > numbers unique for now? Test numbers within a subdir are unique. So yes, ext4/123 and btrfs/123 are recognised as different tests. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Crash with 3.8.3 and TuxOnIce, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request, Theodore Ts'o |
| Next by Thread: | Probable Upcoming Sales of Nuvilex, Inc. (NVLX) Cancer Treatments Render Investment in Technology Valuable, Investor's Daily Update |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |