| To: | Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad? |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:05:45 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <513F17F3.1010204@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20130312062001.GJ21651@dastard> <20130312062531.GK21651@dastard> <513EE274.6090808@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130312103138.GN21651@dastard> <513F0C07.1060000@xxxxxxxxxx> <513F17F3.1010204@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:56:35PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: > More info, 3.7.0 is the oldest kernel on my environment, I ran into the > same problem. Thanks for following up so quickly, Jeff. So the problem is that a new test is tripping over a bug that has been around for a while, not that it is a new regression. OK, so I'll expunge that from my testing for the moment as I don't ahve time to dig in and find out what the cause is right now. If anyone else wants to.... :) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad?, Jeff Liu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 00/21] xfs: metadata CRCs, third version, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad?, Jeff Liu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad?, Jeff Liu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |